The representatives of developed experience of. In their interpretation an intellectual capital consists of individual skills, necessary for satisfaction of requirements of clients (I.e. actually « capital»), organizational possibilities of to satisfy the necessities of market («structural ») and advantages of trade mark and name of company (« capital»). In obedience to this model, all three of intellectual capital of organization can be measured and appraised.

Examining control system as element of, we must turn above all things, on the decision of what tasks it is directed, and what methods are here used.

Term a «management» originally meant ability to go around horse and by them to govern. The English word of manage (to manage) originates from the root of the Latin word of manus (hand). Then began to designate ability to own a weapon and to manage chariots this word.

A modern concept «management» means the process of different taking into account their aims, terms of implementation, implementation phases.

Stopped more detailed for the basic types of management, more frequent than all will be realized in different organizations.

Under the type of management we will understand, description that, how made decision (administrative form) and what method these decisions will be realized by (management lever).

What types of management can be selected?

1. This type is characterized a collectivism administrative form which supposes individual acceptance of decisions the leader of collective. A main lever of management is authority of leader which supposes the large advance of trust to him from the side of members of collective. Often on the norms of collectivism administrative form leader of сосредотачивает in the hands the large personal power and labours for practically an implicit submission from the side of slave. At the same time often a leader is the «source of wisdom», that conduces to uncritical acceptance of his opinion as most faithful, carefully thought out and advantageous for employees.

If a leader operates under right, formulated as traditions, rules of conduct collective, then he is perceived the members of collective as the effective enjoys the confidence of inferiors. However if a leader begins to violate the set norms, stops to follow the generally accepted traditions, then he can be «overturned». Advance of violation of norms, or credit (Hollander E.P., 1969), for every leader it.